Ticagrelor vs placebo for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric sickle cell disease: the HESTIA3 study.

The phase 3 HESTIA3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of the reversible P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor vs placebo in preventing vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Patients aged 2 to 17 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive weight-based doses of ticagrelor or matching placebo. The primary end point was the rate of vaso-occlusive crises, a composite of painful crises and/or acute chest syndrome (ACS). Key secondary end points included number and duration of painful crises, number of ACS events, and number of vaso-occlusive crises requiring hospitalization or emergency department visits. Exploratory end points included the effect of ticagrelor on platelet activation. In total, 193 patients (ticagrelor, n = 101; placebo, n = 92) underwent randomization at 53 sites across 16 countries. The study was terminated 4 months before planned completion for lack of efficacy. Median ticagrelor exposure duration was 296.5 days. The primary end point was not met: estimated yearly incidence of vaso-occlusive crises was 2.74 in the ticagrelor group and 2.60 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.50; P = .7597). There was no evidence of efficacy for ticagrelor vs placebo across secondary end points. Median platelet inhibition with ticagrelor at 6 months was 34.9% predose and 55.7% at 2 hours' postdose. Nine patients (9%) in the ticagrelor group and eight patients (9%) in the placebo group had at least one bleeding event. In conclusion, no reduction of vaso-occlusive crises was seen with ticagrelor vs placebo in these pediatric patients with SCD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03615924.

Effects of a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator (AZD9567) versus prednisolone in healthy volunteers: two phase 1, single-blind, randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids are highly effective and widely used anti-inflammatory drugs, but their use is limited by serious side-effects, including glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycaemia and diabetes. AZD9567 is a non-steroidal, selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator that aims to reduce side-effects. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of AZD9567 in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Two phase 1 clinical studies were done. First, a randomised, placebo-controlled, single-blind, single-ascending dose study was done in healthy men who received single oral doses of AZD9567 2 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, or 155 mg, or prednisolone 60 mg (n=8 per dose group, randomly assigned [6:2] to receive active drug or placebo). Second, a randomised, active-controlled, single-blind, multiple-ascending dose study was done, in which men and women received oral AZD9567 or prednisolone once daily for 5 days. One cohort of volunteers with prediabetes received AZD9567 10 mg (n=7) or prednisolone 20 mg (n=2). All other cohorts comprised healthy volunteers, receiving AZD9567 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, or 125 mg (n=7 per dose group), or prednisolone 5 mg (n=13), 20 mg (n=16), or 40 mg (n=13). Participants and study centre staff were masked to treatment assignment for each cohort, although data were unmasked for safety review between cohorts. The primary outcome of the single-ascending dose study was the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single ascending doses of AZD9567; for the multiple-ascending dose study it was the safety and tolerability of AZD9567 following multiple ascending doses. As a secondary outcome, effects on glycaemic control were ascertained with oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) done at baseline and on day 1 of the single-ascending dose study, and at baseline and on day 4 of the multiple-ascending dose study. These trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02512575 and NCT02760316. FINDINGS: In the single-ascending dose study, between Nov 18, 2015, and Sept 26, 2016, 72 healthy white men were enrolled, and all completed the study. In the multiple-ascending dose study, between May 2, 2016, and Sept 13, 2017, 77 predominantly white male volunteers (including nine individuals with prediabetes and eight women) were enrolled and 75 completed the study. All doses of AZD9567 and prednisolone were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events or events suggesting adrenal insufficiency. In the single-ascending dose study, nine adverse events of mild intensity were reported (five with AZD9567 and four with placebo); no adverse event was reported by more than one person. In the multiple-ascending dose study, 44 adverse events of mild or moderate intensity were reported (18 with AZD9567 and 26 with prednisolone). The most common were headache and micturition. Apparent clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life of AZD9567 were consistent across doses and for single versus repeated dosing. In the multiple-ascending dose study, OGTTs showed no significant difference with AZD9567 doses up to 80 mg compared with prednisolone 5 mg in glucose area under the curve from 0 h to 4 h post-OGTT (AUC0-4h) from baseline to day 4; the increase in glucose AUC0-4h from baseline to day 4 was significantly lower with all AZD9567 doses versus prednisolone 20 mg (AZD9567 20 mg p<0·0001, 40 mg p=0·0001, 80 mg p=0·0001, and 125 mg p=0·0237). INTERPRETATION: AZD9567 appears to be safe and well tolerated in healthy, predominantly white male volunteers and shows promising initial evidence for improved post-prandial glucose control. Studies of longer duration, with a greater proportion of women and other ethnic groups, and in patients requiring anti-inflammatory treatment are needed to characterise the clinical efficacy and safety profile of AZD9567. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Ticagrelor versus placebo for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric sickle cell disease: Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 study (HESTIA3).

BACKGROUND: An unmet need for therapies exists to reduce sickle cell disease (SCD) complications in pediatric patients. Activated platelets contribute to the formation of cellular aggregates during sickling and vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). Ticagrelor is an oral, direct-acting, and reversible adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor antagonist that inhibits platelet activation and aggregation. Although ticagrelor was well tolerated in two phase 2 studies in children and young adults with SCD, larger and longer-term treatment studies are needed to assess ticagrelor's efficacy to reduce VOCs. HESTIA3 will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ticagrelor versus placebo over a minimum of 1 year (maximum 2 years) in pediatric patients with SCD. METHODS: Approximately 180 patients (aged ≥ 2 to <18 years) with SCD (≥ 2 VOCs in the prior year) from 18 countries will be randomized 1:1 to ticagrelor or placebo. Primary endpoint: number of VOCs (a composite endpoint of painful crises and/or acute chest syndrome); key secondary endpoints: hospitalizations, pain intensity and analgesic use during VOCs, acceptability of formulation, and health-related quality of life. The weight-based doses of ticagrelor are set by modeling and simulation. Platelet inhibition data, measured by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein assay, will be collected for exploratory purposes. CONCLUSIONS: HESTIA3 aims to demonstrate that using greater target platelet inhibition than previous studies on SCD, ticagrelor will decrease the frequency of VOC in pediatric patients. Trial Identifier: NCT03615924; EudraCT2017-002421-38.

Development Strategy and Relative Bioavailability of a Pediatric Tablet Formulation of Ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ticagrelor is a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor approved as an antiplatelet drug for patients with acute coronary syndrome or a history of myocardial infarction. Ticagrelor is also being investigated for the reduction of vaso-occlusive crises in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. A pediatric formulation suitable for this age range was developed; the development strategy is described. Primary objectives were determining the relative bioavailability of ticagrelor pediatric tablets and granules for oral suspension to the adult immediate-release tablet, and the pediatric tablets taken whole and dispersed/suspended in water to the granules for oral suspension. Bioequivalence between the pediatric tablet taken whole or suspended in water was also assessed. Secondary objectives were comparing the formulations' safety and tolerability. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, four-period, cross-over, single-dose study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed for ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios were contained completely within the 80.00-125.00% limits for ticagrelor/AR-C124910XX. RESULTS: Forty-four healthy adults (95% white; 57% male) were included. Similar bioavailability of ticagrelor (and AR-C124910XX) was demonstrated for all comparisons tested. Ticagrelor pediatric tablets taken whole were bioequivalent to pediatric tablets suspended in water. The plasma concentration-time profiles for ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were similar, showing rapid ticagrelor absorption and AR-C124910XX formation. All formulations were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Similar bioavailability of a new pediatric dispersible tablet formulation of ticagrelor for use across a wide age range of pediatric patients was demonstrated compared with other oral ticagrelor formulations. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03126695. EUDRACT: 2017-000371-93.

Inverse Correlation between the Atrial Fibrillatory Rate and the Ventricular Repolarization Time: Observations at Baseline and after an Intravenous Infusion of a Combined Potassium and Sodium Current Blocker.

BACKGROUND: The atrial fibrillatory rate (AFR) and the ventricular rate and repolarization (QTcF) were studied at baseline and under the influence of the combined potassium and sodium current blocker AZD7009. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were randomized to an intravenous infusion of AZD7009 or placebo. The atrial fibrillatory activity in lead V1 was extracted using spatiotemporal QRST cancellation. The exponential decay (ED) characterized the degree of atrial signal organization. RESULTS: The mean (SD) AFR at baseline was 396  ±  57 (range 253-584) and 410 ± 33 (range 363-469) bpm in patients randomized to AZD7009 and placebo, respectively. The AFR decreased within the first minutes of the AZD7009 infusion and reached its minimum of 235 ± 34 bpm after 18 minutes. On placebo, the AFR was unchanged. On AZD7009, the ED decreased from 1.2 ± 0.3 to reach its lowest level at 0.7 ± 0.2 after 14 minutes. The ventricular rate did not change significantly over time. The AFR was statistically significantly related to the ventricular repolarization at baseline, the QTcF being longer at lower AFR values, and this relationship remained during and after AZD7009. In the full multivariate linear regression model, including age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, QRS duration, heart rate, QTcF, AF episode duration, AF history duration, and right atrial or left atrial size, only QTcF and age were statistically significantly correlated with the AFR. The correlation remained when the uncorrected QT interval was used. CONCLUSIONS: The QTcF was inversely correlated with AFR, both at baseline and during administration of AZD7009. The AFR was not correlated with the ventricular rate.

A randomized invasive cardiac electrophysiology study of the combined ion channel blocker AZD1305 in patients after catheter ablation of atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the cardiac electrophysiological and hemodynamic effects of an intravenous infusion of the combined ion channel blocker AZD1305. METHODS: After successful ablation of atrial flutter, patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 12) or AZD1305 (n = 38) in 4 ascending dose groups. Electrophysiological and hemodynamic measurements were performed before and commencing 20 minutes after start of infusion. RESULTS: Left atrial effective refractory period increased dose and the primary outcome measure increased dose and plasma concentration dependently, with a mean increase of 55 milliseconds in dose group 3. There was a corresponding increase in right atrial effective refractory period of 84 milliseconds. The right ventricular effective refractory period and the paced QT interval also increased dose and concentration dependently, by 59 and 70 milliseconds, respectively, in dose group 3. There were indications of moderate increases of atrial, atrioventricular nodal, and ventricular conduction times. No consistent changes in intracardiac pressures were observed, but there was a small transient decrease in systolic blood pressure. Adverse events were consistent with the study population and procedure, and there were no signs of proarrhythmia despite marked delay in ventricular repolarization in some individuals. CONCLUSIONS: AZD1305 shows electrophysiological characteristics indicative of potential antiarrhythmic efficacy in atrial fibrillation.